Thursday, August 26, 2010

Intro and William Gass

This is for my enjoyment more than anything. The reason I'm making this blog public is because I'm poor and I was lying on my mat in the corner of my friend's living room where i currently live, dreaming of being rich without having to change my lifestyle, and I thought to myself what if i started a blog and i sent it to a few friends and they sent it to their friends and they to their's and all of a sudden everyone was reading it and someone from a publishing house saw it and really liked it and wanted to pay me to write it... wouldn't that be sick.

So here are some excerpts from books, poems, essays, and stories - little nuggets from bonafide, real-life published shit, transcribed here (by yours truly) for your and my edification and enjoyment. If I feel the urge, maybe I'll throw in my two cents worth, but mostly it's about the passages. I have a longstanding personal interest in literary trends and the evolution of writing from modernism to postmodernism to the as yet undefined next step, but like I said it's mostly about the passages. Read them and take them at face value. Ignore my commentary if it doesn't agree with you. More than anything, I hope you find something you like - maybe a style of writing, maybe a theme, maybe the way certain words roll off the tongue.

I'll leave you with an excerpt from a William Gass essay on Three Lives, by Gertrude Stein. I've never read Three Lives and I didn't immediately take to the passage Gass quotes here, but I was rocked to the core by what he had to say about it and the elegance with which he said it. His description of what distinguishes literature from the writing you read in blogs, magazines, and newspapers, is something I often come back to.

from "Three Lives" in A Temple of Texts, by William Gass

Although I had certainly heard the usual things about Gertrude Stein, and had encountered samples that made me think she might indeed be the fake that others had advertised, I did not read Three Lives until I was in graduate school at Cornell in - perhaps - 1948. I remember the room, the chair, the failing light in which I began the book, going straight through from Anna to Lena and then rereading "Melanctha" immediately after; reading right on through the night, in an actual sweat of wonder and revelation I would experience with this work and no other. My stomach held the text in its coils as if i had swallowed the pages. I am sure I would have taken it as an omen had I known that Three Lives had been published on my birthday, July 30. I never slept. First I paced as well as I could, for my room was very small, and then I went out in the foggy early morning to walk, carrying the library's copy with one finger squeezed between its pages and at the lines I'd return to again and again - to listen, verify, reassure - a paragraph I've commented on in another essay, and whose words are Rose Johnson's:

"I don't see Melanctha why you should talk like you would kill yourself just because you're blue. I'd never kill myself Melanctha just 'cause I was blue. I'd maybe kill somebody else Melanctha 'cause I was blue, but I'd never kill myself. If i ever killed myself Melanctha it'd be by accident, and if I ever killed myself by accident Melanctha, I'd be awful sorry."

In my stunned, sickish, and sleepless state, I didn't notice right away that Rose Johnson, when she is speaking about Melanctha's melancholy, says "just because you're blue" (in iambs), but when she is speaking about her own unlikely suicide, she says "just 'cause I was blue" (in spondees). "Because" and "'cause," "'cause" and "because." I felt a lot like Jeff Campbell, too. I felt slow and confused. Because: Why hadn't I known long before reading Stein - was I such a dunce? - that the art was in the music - it was Joyce's music, it was James's music, it was Faulkner's music; without the music, words fell to the earth in prosy pieces; without the music, there was only comprehension, and comprehension may have been analysis, may have been interpretation, may have been philosophy, but it wasn't art; art was the mind carried to conclusions ahead of any understanding by the music - the order, release, and sounding of the meaning. Not just because of a little alliteration, the pitter-patter of metrical feet, a repetition like a chant, or rhyme concealed the way Poe's letter was - in plain view - but because of complex conceptual relations made audible.

3 comments:

  1. William Gass was in grad school in 1948? Woooh... Anyways its the jouissance of language- as the ghost who haunts me says, "..but what you have to avoid, above all, is labor and boredom. You mustn't weary language, you mustn't force it to say what it doesn't want to. Even if you have your own idea, you have to avoid making language suffer. And its a question of rhythm..."

    Dreaming of being rich without having to work for it is the new inverted American Dream, surely more noble than its long defunct original incarnation. Clog in the machine jobs are becoming harder and harder to come by (labor increasingly obsolete), let alone starting a business and working really hard at it to become rich (people still attempt this?). The magic gambling method- the stock market, flipping properties, invention/patent, quick company creation to be sold are also becoming increasingly risky and are not fully available to us laymen types. So what is left for us?

    Obviously it is the Wutang model of wealth/recognition creation- highly skilled individuals who agree to enter a hive-mind union in order as a group to do what individually they could not, power in numbers united through a streamlined original concept. Even if you do not agree with everything, you do it because it is still your best chance of making it BIG. So let us agree that we do not do this for fun. Was Wutang created for fun? We do this so we can be grab some of the life blood floating out their in e-space without having to resort to the salaried crumbs given to robot machines. To not work, but still survive!

    Tom make me an admin! I want to transcribe something. I promise I will not hurricane blitz the blog again with overly excessive creative marginalia, this time I am dedicated to the goal of wealth and am fully willing to let you be the RZA to my ODB (or Ghostface, yea i'll be Ghostface) Once famous, we will split off to do highly successful solo blogs!

    Young intellectuals of the world unite! Do not let your cynicism/apathy dissuade you from thinking this will never work, look at Freddie Gibbs, he
    made it out of GARY, INDIANA, he has the right to truly hate on things, not us. Tame your ADD addled brain, let us have a focal point, an idea that we follow through with. Have you heard the Bieber song 800% slowed down? THAT WAS MY IDEA, that's my implosion technique, I conceptualized it much more deeply than just "woah doesnt this sound cool slowed down" I was gonna reverb certain parts build choruses and orchestra movements, echo and filter other regions...damn. Now if somebody takes my idea of doing unofficial music videos of kids rolling through upscale Thai malls set to Gucci Mane songs....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Also maybe you should set justify as the default setting of the paragraphs, these uneven sentence lines look unprofessionaal.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is dope Tom - so glad you're doing this. Have you read any Donald Barthelme? An interesting variation on the 'postmodern' writer (very different in content from DFW but w similarities in style and the reaction to a modernist legacy) Much love, hope all else is well! - Laurel

    ReplyDelete